Asynchronous discussions, for example, are one of these tools. Durrington, Berryhill, and Swafford (2006) recommended base on literature support that guidelines for minimum contribution need to be establish clearly, detailed and clear explanation of the characteristics of quality posting must be presents, and instructors must challenge students individually with questions that are related to their post.
In terms instructor the role is change. Instructors cannot be traditional transmitters of knowledge. We need to change. This change is not an easy one. We developed under traditional classrooms, where the “A” was for the professor, the “B” for the book and the “C” for the student. Using Peter Senge concept I would say that we have to change our ‘mental models’ about instructors. Siemens (2008) described new roles. For Siemens we have to become master artists, curators, concierge and network administrators in order to engage more effectible our students.
I agree with these new roles. I am confident that with new generation our instructor role will be more accepted and these tools would need modification. Engaging students effectible in online environments is a continual evolving experience.
References:
Durrington, V. A., Berryhill, A., & Swafford, J. (2006). Strategies for enhancing student interactivity in an online environment. College Teaching, 54(1), 190-193.<
Siemens, G. (2008). Learning and knowing in networks: Changing roles for educators and designers. ITForum.
